"Instead, the majority argued that because the state had designated the area as blighted, the takings were therefore a 'public use,' and it was not the place of the court to interfere. Nevermind that the determination of blight was based largely on a study funded by . . . the aspiring developer."
Saturday, November 28, 2009
New York Appellate Court Rules in Favor of Basketball Arena Developers - WSJ.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment