"At a court hearing in San Francisco, White [who apparently gets his latest opinions from the Internet] said he had 'serious questions' about whether the legal measures sought by the bank 'would be constitutionally approriate' and whether they constituted prior restraint by the government. He also cited 'possible violations of the First Amendment.'"
I guess the judge was just having a little fun at the expense of the First Amendment. Weee, look how powerful I am!
No comments:
Post a Comment